Risk Assessment in Criminal Sentencing.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The past several years have seen a surge of interest in using risk assessment in criminal sentencing, both to reduce recidivism by incapacitating or treating high-risk offenders and to reduce prison populations by diverting low-risk offenders from prison. We begin by sketching jurisprudential theories of sentencing, distinguishing those that rely on risk assessment from those that preclude it. We then characterize and illustrate the varying roles that risk assessment may play in the sentencing process. We clarify questions regarding the various meanings of "risk" in sentencing and the appropriate time to assess the risk of convicted offenders. We conclude by addressing four principal problems confronting risk assessment in sentencing: conflating risk and blame, barring individual inferences based on group data, failing adequately to distinguish risk assessment from risk reduction, and ignoring whether, and if so, how, the use of risk assessment in sentencing affects racial and economic disparities in imprisonment.
منابع مشابه
Predictive Bias and Disparate Impact Jennifer
* The views expressed in this article are those of the authors alone and do not reflect the official position of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. Lowenkamp specifically advises against using the PCRA to inform front-end sentencing decisions or back-end decisions about release without first conducting research on its use in these contexts, given that the PCRA was not designed for th...
متن کاملRisk Assessment by Mental Health Professionals and the Prevention of Future Violent Behaviour
Disclaimer: This research paper does not necessarily reflect the policy position of the Australian Government Toni Makkai Acting Director The concept of ”risk assessment‘ is of increasing relevance when dealing with the prevention of criminal behaviour. This risk can be examined from a number of viewpoints. In an earlier Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice paper (no. 280) the risk of ...
متن کاملEvidence - Based Sentencing and the Scientific Rationalization of Discrimination Sonja
This paper critiques, on legal and empirical grounds, the growing trend of basing criminal sentences on actuarial recidivism risk prediction instruments that include demographic and socioeconomic variables. I argue that this practice violates the Equal Protection Clause and is bad policy: an explicit embrace of otherwise-condemned discrimination, sanitized by scientific language. To demonstrate...
متن کاملRisk Redux: The Resurgence of Risk Assessment in Criminal Sanctioning
Review by: John Monahan and Jennifer L. Skeem Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 26, No. 3, Critical Issues in the Use of Risk Assessments, Prior Record Enhancements, and Probation/Parole Revocation (February 2014), pp. 158-166 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Vera Institute of Justice Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/fsr.2014.26.3.158 . Accessed: 23/0...
متن کاملEvidence-based Sentencing and the Scientific Rationalization of Discrimination
This Article critiques, on legal and empirical grounds, the growing trend of basing criminal sentences on actuarial recidivism risk prediction instruments that include demographic and socioeconomic variables. I argue that this practice violates the Equal Protection Clause and is bad policy: an explicit embrace of otherwise-condemned discrimination, sanitized by scientific language. To demonstra...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Annual review of clinical psychology
دوره 12 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016